Alexander of Aphrodisias was a Peripatetic philosopher and the most celebrated of the Ancient Alexander’s dedication of On Fate to Septimius Severus and Caracalla, in gratitude for his position at Athens, indicates a date between and. Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Ethical Problems R. W. Sharples (Tr.): Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ethical Problems. (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle.) Pp. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Fate: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Alexander (ed.) Alexander of Aphrodisias in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy.
|Published (Last):||25 September 2014|
|PDF File Size:||13.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In particular, he held that man is responsible for self-caused decisions, and can choose to do or not to do something. Sharples – – The Classical Review 36 Most interesting from our point of view are those questions that deal with metaphysical issues, like the relation of form and matter, and with the status of universals in general see TweedaleSharplesand Sirkel Hegel Martin Heidegger Heraclitus R.
In his ethics he deals with the question of whether individuals have free choice, once their character is settled. Madigan ; Sharples ;2. Academic Tools How to cite this entry. As he claims time and again, the Stoics can defend the use of these terms at best in a verbal sense.
History of Western Philosophy. Sharples,Theophrastus of Eresus, alexaander for his life, writings, thought and Influencepage Readers will not always be convinced by his suggestions but they will often find them helpful and informative where Aristotle is overly compressed and obscure.
So if one argues in this way it follows that one both says that nothing comes to be without a cause and preserves the coming-to-be of some things as a result of luck and fortuitously, and the existence of what depends on fatw and the contingent, in the realm of facts and not just as expressions.
Aspasius relates that the former is the more ancient reading, but that it was later changed by Eudorus and Euharmostus.
Alexander of Aphrodisias On Fate, or How Human Beings Escape Determinism
Causation and the unity of the universe. In commenting, Alexander usually refrains from giving comprehensive surveys. Will this be, or not? Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum. That he had quite some interest in ethical problems, however, is witnessed by the discussions in his own treatises. The first statement, at any rate, that all the things that are become causes of some of the things after them, and that in this way things are connected to one another by the later being attached to the earlier in the manner of a chain, this being what they propose as the essence as if it were of fate — how is this not clearly in conflict with the facts?
Scholars nowadays continue to make use of his commentaries, not only for historical reasons but also because his suggestions are often worth considering in their own right. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. As these writings show, his main contemporary opponents were the Stoics, but there is also some evidence of a controversy with Galen.
Whether his polemics against contemporary versions of Stoic doctrine were part of a personal exchange or rather a bookish exercise is unclear.
Alexander of Aphrodisias – Wikipedia
AD was a Peripatetic philosopher and the most celebrated of the Ancient Greek commentators on the writings of Aristotle. Sharples – – The Classical Review 36 Alexander of Aphrodisias, on Fate Pierre Thillet: In this seminar we will closely study De fato and relevant parts of other works of Fzte, reconstruct and assess the arguments, and compare them to later arguments in the history of philosophy up to our day.
A full bibliography will be posted on Blackboard. Alexander does not generally go through the text line by line, but chooses to discuss certain issues while omitting others.
A subtest can be graded as unsatisfactory. Of what the fact that certain leaves are double? This entry has no external links. R W Sharples Tr.
Alexander of Aphrodisias – – Cornell University Press. He was a student of the two Stoic or possibly Peripateticphilosophers Sosigenes  and Herminus and perhaps of Aristotle of Mytilene.
Treatises considered genuine aohrodisias fragments Bruns, Ivo ed. It is unclear when and by whom these collections were put together. On the Cosmospage 1.
History and Philosophy of the Sciences.