DSPE ACT 1946 PDF

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is the premier investigating agency of India. . The amended Delhi Special Police Establishment Act empowers a The legal powers of investigation of the CBI are derived from the DSPE Act , . provisions of Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, ( Central members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment, we do not think the . Preamble1 – DELHI SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENT ACT, Section1 – Short title and extent. Section1A – Interpretation section. Section2 – Constitution.

Author: Mazugore Tokasa
Country: Benin
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 5 September 2013
Pages: 40
PDF File Size: 11.92 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.28 Mb
ISBN: 734-4-92439-256-6
Downloads: 64049
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Garr

With regard to the time factor for taking a decision, as proposed by the learned Attorney-General it is worth referring to Dr. Railway Claims Tribunal 1.

Retrieved 26 November The Supreme Court as the sentinel on the qui vive, has been invested with the powers which are elastic and flexible and in certain areas the rigidity in exercise of such powers is considered inappropriate. I am concerned mainly with subsection 3 of Section Veeraswami4 was held distinguishable.

State Of Bihar TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. They referred to the orders passed by this Court in 2G case and, particularly, reference was made to the order dated Dharampal TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Sushil Kumar Khajuria And Others… v. State Delhi Administration v. State Of Karnataka TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.

In such a process, the people acquainted with facts and circumstances of the case would also have a sense of security and they would cooperate with the investigation given that the superior courts are seized of the matter.

DELHI SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENT ACT

It had its headquarters in Lahore. Start Tour No Thanks.

Retrieved 18 September Its jurisdiction extended to the Union Territories, and could be further extended to the states with the consent of the state governments involved. In this light, the interplay between Section 6A of the Act and a constitutional court monitored investigation should be such as to protect senior government officials from frivolous and vexatious complaints and at the same time prevent them from exercising influence or prolonging the grant of previous approval by the Central Government thereby effectively scuttling the investigation.

  AMERCOAT 65 PDF

Mohan Lal TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.

Union of India and Anr; 1 SCC [2] These writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India brought dwpe public interest, to begin with, did not appear to have the potential of escalating to the dimensions they reached or to give rise to several issues of considerable significance to the implementation of rule of law, which they have, during their progress. It is an evident fact that whoever reaches the top tries to manipulate things in his own way.

And, if you were to say that there is no protection to be given to you, when you take all the decisions, when you make all vspe discretions, and anybody can file a complaint, and an inspector or the CBI or the police dspr raid your house any moment, if this elementary protection is not to be given to the senior decision- makers, you may well have a governance where instead of tendering honest advice to political executives, a very safe, non-committal advice is going to be given.

The CBI at present has three wings: Ram Prakash Sharma v. Our algorithms sense that you may get better results by trying out the same espe in our CaseIQ TM interface. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal 0. This request sct previous approval was in sharp contrast to the submission earlier made by the CBI in Centre for Public Interest Litigation v.

The proper way for the Court, as stated in Union Carbide20in exercise of the powers under Article is to take note of the express prohibitions in any substantive statutory provision based on some fundamental principles of public policy and regulate the exercise of its power and discretion accordingly. Court or an order of acquittal passed by the Court of Session in revision. Later, it was decided not to appeal their release.

PRS makes every effort to zct reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete.

A arrest of militants in Kashmir led to a raid on dsle brokers, revealing evidence of large-scale payments to national politicians. Concluding the discussion, the Constitution Bench held in paragraph 68 vii of the Report that the power of judicial review exercisable by a constitutional court cannot be restricted by a statutory provision. NDA government, on 25 Novembermoved an amendment bill to do away with the requirement of quorum in high-profile committee while recommending the names, for the post of director CBI, to the central government by introducing the clause “no appointment of a CBI director shall be invalid merely by reason of any vacancy or absence of members in the panel”.

  LOKAVEERAM LYRICS IN TELUGU PDF

Supreme Court Of India.

The primary question was: The dying declaration is The registration of First Information Report may also be done on the direction of Constitutional Courts, in which case it is not necessary for the offence to have been notified for investigation by DSPE. Right to Information Act. The learned Attorney General sought time to seek instructions and report to the Court by way of an affidavit on behalf of the Central Government.

The central government may extend to any area except Union Territories the powers and jurisdiction of the CBI for investigation, subject to the consent of the dspw of the concerned state. Union Of India v.

The Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. In the xspe and compelling circumstances referred to above, the superior courts may monitor an investigation to ensure that the investigating agency conducts the investigation in a free, fair and time-bound manner without any external interference.

High Court or an order of acquittal passed by the Court of Session in revision. Or, do we have some screening mechanism whereby serious complaints would be investigated and frivolous complaints would be thrown out? How ‘Congress Bureau of Investigation’ works”. Advani; former Union ministers V. State Of Goa v. Delhi Special Police Establishment Act25 of 2 c ,8 b ,14 When Court monitors the investigation, there is already departure inasmuch as the investigating agency informs the Court about the progress of the investigation.