Francis Fukuyama’s Our Posthuman Future fears that biotechnology will make monsters of us. Steven Rose weighs the evidence. The power to genetically enhance future generations could be a boon for humanity – or it could lead to an era of violent rebellion against the. Is a baby whose personality has been chosen from a gene supermarket still a human? If we choose what we create what happens to morality? Is this the end of .
|Published (Last):||23 April 2010|
|PDF File Size:||6.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.31 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Fukuyama refers to the irreducible totality of these qualities as “Factor X”, “the complex whole” as opposed to fukuama sum of simple parts”, which forms the foundation of human dignity. Or it could be the kind of soft tyranny envisioned in Brave New World, in which everyone is healthy and happy but has forgotten the meaning of hope, fear, or struggle.
Don’t mess with human nature…
The Future of Human Nature. For anyone seeking an ideal entry into the biotechnology debate, Fukuyama’s book is it. This article needs additional citations for verification. So who is to tell us that being human and having dignity means sticking with a set of emotional responses that are the accidental by-product of our evolutionary posthuan
Review: Our Posthuman Future by Francis Fukuyama | Books | The Guardian
Hence, he argues, there is a human nature on which human rights can be based. Other editions – View all Our Posthuman Future: Should We Live Forever?: Retrieved from ” https: It is because he has belatedly realised that so long as scientific and technological innovation proceeds at its current breakneck pace, social stasis – the end of history – is impossible.
That some of us are sceptical about its feasibility should not prevent us from looking hard at its potential furure. Fukuyama recognizes that translation of human nature into rights is difficult, but possible through a rational discussion of human ends. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Despite the poor repute in which concepts such as natural rights are held by academic philosophers, much of our political world rests on the existence of a stable human “essence” with which we are endowed by nature, or rather, on the fact that we believe that such an essence exists.
But in another sense it is profoundly egalitarian, since everyone, regardless of social class, race or ethnicity, has to play in it. This text does neither. Share your thoughts with other customers. Fukuyama sketches a brief history of man’s changing understanding of human nature: Nothing imaginative here, fukuama the usual fear mongering. True freedom means the freedom of political communities to protect the values they hold most dear, and it is that freedom that we need to exercise with regard to the biotechnology revolution today.
Thank you for your feedback. The much more common dystopic writing of the past 50 years has largely been posited on disruptive scientific and technological fantasies. And will failure to initiate widespread government oversight of scientific research that could change this definition open a Pandora’s Box fiture dire consequences? But another important reason for the persistence of the idea of futurs universality of human dignity has to do with what we might call the nature of nature itself.
So, finally, to the tough question: Instead of taking these characteristics and saying that they are the basis for “human dignity,” why don”t fjkuyama simply accept our destiny as creatures who modify themselves? There were many aspects of biotechnology that I had never taken the time to familiarize myself with but this book answered a lot of my questions. Today, the “genetic lottery” guarantees that the son or daughter of a rich and successful parent will not necessarily inherit the talents and abilities that created conditions conducive to the parent’s success.
In Brave New Worldreligion has been abolished and Christianity is a distant memory.
Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. This is the world of classical tyranny, technologically empowered but not so different from what we have tragically seen and known in human history.
Political freedom has heretofore meant the freedom to pursue those ends that our natures had established for us. Again, prepare to be disappointed: East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. Fukuyama argues that “the most significant threat” from biotechnology is “the possibility that it will alter human nature and thereby move us into a ‘posthuman’ stage of history.
And insofar as human biotechnology threatens to interfere with that human nature, it is essential that it be regulated. As the FSG publicity material notes, Fukuyama famously declared in the wake of communism’s collapse that “the major alternatives to liberal democracy” had “exhausted themselves.
Critics point out that human nature can be expressed only within the diverse and historically contingent societies that humans create, and therefore cannot be understood a priori. That any notion of human rights and ethics must be founded on a concept of human nature. This futuee that social elites may not just pass on social advantages but embed them genetically as well. Indeed, this is one of the few things in a fukuyyama of the future that people are likely to rouse themselves to fight over.