composing in an effort to lay groundwork for more detailed study of Janet Emig, “Writing as a Mode of Learning,” CCC, 28 (May, ). Emig, Janet. “Writing as a Mode of Learning.” CCC (May ) Emig, in this early article that articulates the importance of a. Emig thus points out the multiple reasons as to why writing is definitely a mode of learning. She uses a great deal of evidence from Vygotzky to.
|Published (Last):||7 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||17.8 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.75 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Writing is uniquely adapted to the task of fostering insight and developing new knowledge. I used to read my Social Study, Biology, or Literature books, synthesize, analyze, create diagrams, and in the process I would managed to re-write 3 pages of material into a page product.
Much of their burden of learning academic writing as a separate course can be lessen down. You are commenting using your WordPress. The necessity to establish a connection between all these processes requires of a series of skills that are guide writing as well; for instance the ability to coordinate, subordinate, superordinate, establish causal relations, and possibly narrate and describe Email required Address never made public.
But the process of writing is not hierarchical.
I think those distinctions are a bit too rigid; does anyone else? Writing as a mode of learning by Janet Emig: Emig feels that the temporal aspect of writing relates perfectly with our learning process because both of these processes are slow. It helps writers to stick to their eemig goals. According to Jerome Learninng and Jean Piaget, people learn in three ways: I thought I had finally found proof of what my parents thought was a very poor way of studying when I was in high school.
Although she focuses mainly on writing and talking, she also touches on a few other topics in less detail.
Writing as a Mode of Learning | Ethereal Education
Of course now I realize that my dad was right, and that had I not learned other ways of studying, I would not be in a graduate program never mind in this class… can you imagine re-writing all these readings!?!?!?!?
She feels that they serve separate and distinct functions and that many people do not realize this. Your email address will not be published. This helps us better to synthesize information. Writing process is a set of individual thinking, and it is a goal directed thinking process that is set by writers. She thinks that writing is not merely valuable or special but unique.
The writers will be clearer, focused and goal directed in their writing. It is so complex, that some of us may think too fast for our hands, and in fact, often have to go back and erase because we start to write a word that should go after some that we skipped. Emig thus points out the multiple reasons as to why writing is definitely a mode of learning.
I am not whining.
Writing as a mode of Learning
Notify me of new comments via email. In order to achieve her purpose, Emig focuses most of her article on the comparison and contrast of writing and talking as a medium of learning. Both sides wrkting the brain are activated in these three actions, and so, learning takes place most effectively in writing.
By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Furthermore, Emig offers a nice list of differences between writing and talking. M on Response 21 — Elbow…. These similar strategies of learning and writing can be used to teach study skills to undergraduates.
It is very insightful on the basis of comparing and contrasting talk and writing because it shows how these ideas are complimentary learning strategies and can help you get the most out of the information being learned.
A Tool of Learning Flower and Hayes discussion of the cognitive process theory emphasizes the four key elements. Home Rhetoric and Writing are Everywhere!
Besides that in my opinion, it is really important to consolidate the knowledge. My only question has to do with the list on page nine, number five: My dad thought I was nuts! She uses a great deal of evidence from Vygotzky to Piaget, to Gardner, she utilizes rather well known theories not only into the physiological process of the brain when people write and learn but also in production of learning through writing.
I think her point in this was to show that the definition of learning can mean different things to different people depending on the context in which it is being discussed. By integrating writing into the learning strategies, things can become easy for the learners. Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment. I found the comparison between the learning strategies and attributes of writing process is actually interesting. Both are multi- representational processes, give self-provided feedbacks, establish synthetic and analytic conceptual groupings, and active and engaging process.
This article also does a great job of adding philosophical insight on the benefits of writing and learning. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Her final point about the uniqueness of writing is that she feels that speech and writing are not at all interchangeable. Writing in her opinion unlike the others is originating and creating verbal construct that is graphically recorded. She starts out by using chemo-physiological definition of learning and then honing in on a more philosophical definition by John Dewey and Jean Piaget.
It focused a bit on the more scientific aspect and how the brain works when you are writing. In the next section of her paper she defines the many differences between writing and talking.
She points out that writing is unique compared to the other three modes of communication because it encompasses both original creation and graphic evidence Emig 8while the other three skills rely heavily on origin or graphic representation, not both. She discusses the idea that the writing process gives you immediate feedback and that feedback includes past, present, and future.
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.