Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture Type: Chapter; Author(s): Louis Montrose; Date: ; Page start: ; Page end: ; Web. Louis Adrian Montrose is an American literary theorist and academic scholar. His scholarship has addressed a wide variety of literary, historical, and theoretical topics and issues, and has significantly shaped contemporary studies of Renaissance poetics, English Renaissance theatre, Louis Montrose’s Homepage · Professing the Renaissance · Miriam Chen’s. Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture. Louis A. Montrose. There has recently emerged within Renaissance studies, as in Anglo- Ameri.
|Published (Last):||20 October 2007|
|PDF File Size:||14.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ideology is a key term here that functions both synchronically and diachronically. However, if we were to ask them to define what the New Historicism is, most of them would struggle to do so. However, the work needed in order to fully excavate these poetics could not be undertaken in the span of a thesis. In what follows, the focus will turn montrrose M.
While this seems like an obvious louks of literary criticism, it remains mainly undefined in all seven texts. Although this is supposed to be a conclusion, I believe it would be wrong to make definite statements about the status thf the New Historicism.
Rather, the term denotes, in his view, a variety of reading practices that share the determination to move beyond the limits of the Old Historicism on the one hand and the New Criticism on the other Greenblatt and Gallagher Dollimore, Jonathan and Alan Sinfield.
Given that Dollimore appears to be the only one who explicitly writes about this issue — and not even as explicitly as is done here — the hypothesis must be made that this is part of a shared methodology as well. Some studies use a literary text to map power relations in a society. However, although being very broadly specified, the third and first characteristics resonate an idea that can be found in about all the other introductions as well: New York and London: Authority, Gender and Representation.
My concern is not to psychoanalyze Forman but rather to emphasize the historical specificity of psychological processes, the politics of the unconscious.
Louis Montrose | Literary Theory and Criticism
Help Center Renwissance new research papers in: Perhaps this is because he has retired from the academic scene for a while now, or maybe because professinh does not appear to have written many theoretical texts concerning the New Historicism throughout his career. This provokes the question as to why mention him at all? While it issues an antitheoretical stance against literary theory, it does so by using literary theory to make its point, proving its necessity whilst trying to undo it.
While this can indeed be taken as diachronic, the focus is different: The framework that resulted from this was, however, a derision from several critical introductions to the New Historicism, and thus only a theoretical one. This was written over 14 years ago and as of today we still lack this operational definition.
This gives his essay that which is missing from the others: This tendency does, however, not occur in every one of the seven texts used as background material here. First of all, I must thank prof.
Louis Montrose – Wikipedia
According to Hens-Piazzaptofessing text and the cultural practices that lead to it has to be seen in materialistic terms Veeser and Dollimore employ a similar terminology: A lot more texts would need to be professong and studied to fully produce a poetics of this literary practice and more case studies are needed to definitively prove the discontinuity between practice and theory that surfaced here.
Yet, my reader will have to wait a little longer montrosr order to discover what this could be — all will be revealed in due course — because there are some people I would like to thank first.
Like displays we might see in a gallery or museum, texts 11 Note: He must, however, also be diachronic: Because of this, they cannot read the original properly.
Click here to sign up. While we cannot say that his practice does not confirm his theoretical stances regarding the four tenets, there is no full match between the two. Overall, it seems as though Loyis is regarded as an example of the New Historicist practice.
Badmington helped me become a better academic researcher through his lectures and support. Pieters, I was able to find a gap in the existing research, which I now hope to — at least partially — fill with my thesis. Some reconstruct discourse by examining extraneous cultural artefacts.
Some explicitly sum up certain characteristics that define the New Historicism, while others simply try to explain the foundations of the practice. This is however only a form of relative autonomy, as stressed by the New Historicism. It thus makes it hard to spot the difference between a synchronic and diachronic approach of the scholar towards a literary text and its relationship with reality.
This creates a historical and ideological distance that needs to be observed, which causes the author to be a historical and social construction both of his own time and that of the observer. An example of this relative autonomy might be in order: Perhaps Montrose, identifying himself as a New Historicist, profeesing a different approach to certain aspects of these poetics.
Literature is thus seen as discourse, in a Foucauldian sense Enter the email address you signed up with renaissanec we’ll email you a reset link.